mamba's latest activity

It's certainly duplicitous to sign a contract assigning rights to your creative work to your company, as a means to encourage every...

Need? Never. Give more options to the end user? That’s what we choose to do.

Neither 1e or 2e had SRDs. I am pretty sure that is what @mamba is talking about. Technically 4e had an SRD, but it is functionally...

no product would need to, but if you are using other things under OGL already, it is probably more convenient

there is no document to review, they would need to create a new one. The 3.x SRDs need a review however

Having it only under CC is not better than having it under CC and OGL. It is better than OGL only

I always read it as the logical interpretation 🤷 The previous item is about the 5.1 SRD and to me that SRD context carried over, there...

Sly Flourish's City of Arches, by Mike Shea recently arrived on my doorstep. I think it's a near perfect setting for the current take on...

Bitter Chalice looks great and something new focusing so much on one city. Lemurian Chronicles is great; a new sword and sorcery setting...

Morrus has the right answer, if for some reason you limit yourself to one, I'd use CC however

I don’t know the difference. I’ll do everyone the favor of not picking one and then arguing about why. 😎

All three. Let the end user choose which suits them best.

I assume they refer to previous editions of the SRD there, not previous editions of D&D, so still only 3.x

They can’t revoke the OGL They couldn’t then, and they can’t now. :)

OSE and OSRIC don’t seem to be holding back. Neither Shadowdark or many others. I want to see it too but I’m not sure it’s entirely...