Maxperson's latest activity

Not even close. I have never argued the other side. I have a vague recollection of someone doing that, but it wasn't me.

He can't see my posts.

Yes. What's the problem? I the player have that control. My PC does not have that control. He's subject to my decisions for him. If...

Because it forces emotion and feeling on the PC that the PC does not have. If I determine that my PC isn't at all intimidated by the...

So then I can do what I want without the -2, because my character wasn't intimidated? Because what you seem not to get, is that if I'm...

I think it's a better question to ask what Cthulhu's domain will be like.

In D&D they don't. But there are several people in this tread arguing that they should. Like that is literally what started this leg of...

Perhaps it would have helped if they told you how well they rolled on their joking roll?

Then what is the -2 penalty for if it's not to represent my character being intimidated due to successful intimidate against him? And I...

Hey, they got rid of 1E's gray elves! So that's something.

No it isn't. You didn't kill a god in the Immortals rules in order to ascend. You grew powerful enough to have an immortal sponsor you...

It was a very vague reference to an old Saturday Night Live sketch, not a shot at anyone.

Micah liked your post, so I thought it might actually mean something that I was missing. :p

I was joking.

It absolutely is forcing the PC to feel certain ways. Let's take intimidation. If you succeed at an intimidation roll against my PC...