mazgrenan's latest activity

In truth I want WotC to create a psion class just so that everyone will finally shut up about it. ;) As we've seen from Spelljammer /...

Its all just Wizard spells? /shrug

We need levels 11-20. The problem is the community and designers. It took 50 years for the Ranger class to get the ability to turn...

Yes, but I think they should perhaps be more distinct in mechanics and/or adventure design from 1-10. Right now high level adventures...

If you were running a business, how much effort would you put into producing something only 10% of your customers seemed interested in...

Eh? The point we run into is that higher level play speaks to greater power, but it doesn't speak to greater character development...

I don't think Nevin was taking about the GM needing to pull out that elephant because the players used high level abilities to win a...

High level play was supported and worked well in 4e. We played up to 30th level in 4e and the maths had crazy high numbers, spells were...

Seems like it's missing the main option; the game doesn't scale well and is too tedious to enjoy at that level, even if you want to.

that still feels like betraying the promised character premise to me. the everyman for alot of people IS the person without a secret...

So do all the other class names.

First of all, Paul is right: Second of all: You can make the level 1 feature of most archetypes into a Ribbon. Warlocks in 2014 were...

Then there's no need for complicated weapons in Goliath society. They can kill with a rock and their fire/frost/etc. That's even more...

I've had people get into D&D expressly in the desire that, "it'll feel like LOTR!" only to come away disgruntled because it's designed...

That might have been the case in the 70s, but near 50 years later, 5E's ranger is not even in the same ballpark as Aragorn. The only...