mearls's latest activity

Exactly. Hearing the different angles in a forum also gives me a broader view of the issue. It's also very useful as a designer to see...

But it could be to one’s benefit to have already heard the likely arguments.

I like arguing about rules on forums so that I don't have to argue about them at the table.

It doesn't help, sadly. There are several areas where the rules are sadly deficient: * the rules are very vague about what "an enemy...

Wow. Are all of you missing the reference to the secret errata encoded into Mike's message? I mean ... HE TELLS YOU THERE IS STEALTH...

Great point. I think we'll end up seeing a hidden condition for that reason. Right now, you have to reverse engineer the conditions for...

I wish they just made a Hidden condition.

Raise your hand if you thought this thread was about rules changes between printings that weren't mentioned in the formal errata docs.

Agree on invisible still muddying the waters, but I think it's a good step forward. I actually like see invisible as a spell that...

See Invisible lets a person see an invisible creature as if they were visible, no more no less. So I argue at that point, the normal...

That would be kind of funny. It reminds me of the episode of Frasier where Frasier and Niles plot and scheme to get into a secret club...

BTW - I wonder how many people are going to read the thread title and wonder if Mike is talking about "secretive" errata that WotC is...

In the new errata, the stealth rules get the following update: Hide [Action] (p. 368) In the second paragraph, “you have the Invisible...

It's great news. I really, really love the commitment to update it with errata. Plus, using the same license just keeps things super easy.

The new version of the System Reference Document, which provides guidelines on how to make material compatible with D&D's revised 5th...