mellored's latest activity

1. This is not natural laws of physics -----> Caster casts true strike. Wiggles their fingers. A magical force guides their hand and...

Might want to add peace cleric as well. They're the two worst offenders. Twilight a great theme as well eg moon and faerie...

Twilight Cleric is possibly the only "OP" subclass. And the only one I ban at my table. As for Ranger, Gloomstalker for 2014. And...

You gain an extra action this turn. That action can be used to take only the Attack (one attack only). As it is with Haste. Or like a...

Also not including Graze. So yea, my wording probably not the best wording.

Seems clean enough to me, but an alternative way would probably be something like. "Make a spell attack roll within the weapons range...

So I agree the spell causes the attack. That doesn’t fully prove that the attack roll for that attack is from the spell. Though...

Just remember that Sorcerer's only get simple weapon proficiency, no weapon mastery, nor armor. So very likely a short bow for 1d6+3...

True Strike specifically says "make an attack with a weapon", beating any general rule of weapon attacks without using a spell.

I'd love the rules quote that says this. and further, what do you mean its not breaking the mundane law of physics. I am making an...

The PCs action for the round is being use to do what? Is it swing a sword or cast a spell? It seems to me that it is used to cast a...

Are you implying i can make "attacks with a weapon" without taking any kind of action? Or can you point to where does it say "as part...

If not the spell, where does the attack come from?

True Strike is a Sorcerer spell you cast. No one is arguing against that. *presuming you took it as a Sorcerer It's an attack...

This. It's an attack. That's the only condition. You're adding a word that isn't there. It says "Advantage on the attack rolls" Not...