Micah Sweet's latest activity
-
Micah Sweet reacted to AlViking's post in the thread D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting. with
Like.
The arguments are based on subjective preferences, opinions and point of view. I don't see adjusting a combat before the encounter... -
Micah Sweet reacted to Ruin Explorer's post in the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4 with Like.
No, it could not have been. That wouldn't have made any sense at all. I think you're reading this and seeing a sentiment you don't...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to Ruin Explorer's post in the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4 with Like.
DLC means downloadable content - i.e. OPTIONAL content you can, if you wish, download (paid or otherwise). It has to be OPTIONAL to be...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to JConstantine's post in the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4 with Like.
Larian released a new subclass for each class in a major update patch. They simply don't do DLC. The only other way content gets added...
-
Micah Sweet replied to the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4.Because the BG brand is where the money is, from the corp perspective.
-
Micah Sweet reacted to mamba's post in the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4 with
Sad.
Of course there will be a BG4, BG3 made enough money to ensure that. Chances are BG3 will also result in quite a few BG4 sales, no... -
Micah Sweet replied to the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4.People who are no longer there.
-
Micah Sweet reacted to Ruin Explorer's post in the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4 with Like.
More like "Of course we're going to attempt to make BG4, waste an insane amount of money on it, and either cancel it 3+ years into...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to BMaC's post in the thread D&D General WotC: 'Of Course We're Going To Do' Baldur's Gate 4 with Like.
It made money so obviously the answer is to make another one...nevermind that the reason BG3 was so successful is solely down to the...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to jmartkdr2's post in the thread I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism with Like.
Species-based subclasses could work if you first universalize the “budget” for subclasses, which they tried but abandoned for 5.5.
-
Micah Sweet reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism with Like.
Heritage in Level Up covers traits such as size, speed, age, senses and a signature trait such as Elven trance or a Dragonborn's breath...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism with Like.
This is a little tangential from D&D, but you could have a setup where every PC picks two options at character creation from the list of...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to Maxperson's post in the thread I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism with Like.
Hot take. The players DO care. They just don't know that they care. In my experience those extra details from world-building make...
-
Micah Sweet reacted to FrozenNorth's post in the thread I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism with Like.
Sure, it is possible. Say you have four base classes: Fighter, Magic-User, Cleric and Rogue. If you were committed to making non-human...
-
Micah Sweet replied to the thread I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism.1. Unwieldy is subjective. It might be too many classes for you. 2. Challenge of differentiation can be overcome with good design work...