Recent content by Micah Sweet

F4 was an excellent movie, and as a huge fan of the team I really wanted it to be. It was IMO at least as good as many, if not most of the pre-Endgame era films.

The only physical books I've gotten in a few years were for Level Up and ACKS II. Lots of pdfs though.

Agreed. I don't back any Kickstarter for the bling.

I liked No Way Home, and Thunderbolts.

Absolutely. Plenty of room for both, not to mention more general empire-stuff to represent the folks funding these expeditions and being pirated.

I'm leaning towards Age of Exploration/Golden Age of Piracy for a fantasy setting, but the Wild West is also an era with a lot of potential.

This is why I was thinking the protomancer.

Sounds exciting! You know I'll be keeping my eye on this. What do people think about the new class? Some kind of spellcaster I assume. Maybe the protomancer from En5ider Magazine #2?

Yeah. A lot of games with which I am unfamiliar, and the ones I am aren't seeming to give me much from the simulationist perspective I prefer.

I click on "alerts" and then "what's new".

But how can they harass you if you can't see them? I'm not trying to be rude, and I apologize if this is coming off that way, I just don't get it.

I'm sorry, I don't think we're on the same page. In regular blocking, you can't see the posts of a person you're blocking. That all makes sense, they no longer exist to you, and there are plenty of reasons why that could be valuable to someone. In two-way blocking, the person you've blocked also...

But if you block the person you can't see anything they target you with. And in any case, does that have to be the default option for everyone?

I don't know if anyone's assuming that. I think you've made your position pretty clear.

I've never understood why it was important that someone you've blocked not see your posts not be able to see yours, even if they can't make any response you can see. Blocking in general makes sense to me (even if I never do it). Two-way blocking doesn't.