I do not. I simply want what is best for D&D. And we all know the quality of the players is the biggest factor in how well a D&D game does. And what produces quality players better then Gygaxian Naturalism??
Sorry but I believe that D&D should purge the weak from its ranks. If you lack sufficient tactics/system matery/fictional positioning then you deserve negative outcomes in your D&D game.
So monsters were designed around four member parties; so your 13th level party was more like a 15th level party. And if your players were good at system optimization/tactical play, they're more like an 18th level party. And if they had a good amount of magic items on them, they would be more...
but 5E is based off attrition?!? so if that barely works, then D&D barely works!?!
oh well, good things most players couldn't care less about rules and how they work.