Mind of tempest's latest activity

Well, if it helps any, I've "spoken" (over forums) with several people over the years who would want to call the RPG police over someone...

my point is that for teiflings it is irrational for them not to be mostly human unless they are derived from a different base. However...

I find this view particularly alien. For me, D&D is a game and a social experience not some sort of high art project.

I think some of it is more that many are ill-defined, we know elves and dwarves very well. other parts is that some are fundamentally...

something that makes them more relatable perhaps a lot of them end up the burned-out "gifted child" the burden of expectation

it is a start, but does not scream angel.

aasimar also lack a distinct look they might as well be human plus

a cool look and angst. Honestly, I more question why the traditionists favour the halflings and gnomes, they do not seem to do anything...

Tieflings have a designated niche, being scrappy underdog devil people, which has made them super popular. Especially amongst people...

Horny people

Sure. They're only boring. Though I have to say, whilst I like tieflings, over-abundance and normalisation sorta threatens to make them...

true but aasimars do not even have that.

aasimars have no iconic look they are boring like that.

Dargonborn as a core race at least makes more sense than halflings or gnomes, who do not build massive buildings to fill with treasure...

Draconians and especially kolbolds fill different fantasy niches - kolbolds would be a bad fit for a genneral "dragon-person" race...