Minigiant's latest activity

My point is you're more likely to get Wizards to design more spells than to design a system where there's no bad saves. Because many of...

Most strikers has attack powers that have movement and minor action movement powers. And the ones that didn't had pushed and slides so...

Instead it had every Warrior attempting to gain out a full attack action against a monster. Either everybody stayed in one spot and...

No. Letting the players break up their movement and attacks was one of the greatest changes 5e made. It’s more intuitive, it creates...

Cough 4e did it. 5e copied.

Thought I did 6 saves is better that 3 saves because if you actually design spells targeting all six saves, a spellcaster would have...

Chicken or Egg 3.5 biggest issues were not theorycraft. The theorrycraft issues were just the most discussed. 3e's move + attack...

D&D needs a huge amount of new spells (and a lot of spells cut or rewritten). There really should be a lot more banishment and binding...

No. That could be easily ruined 5th edition and had it go down as a worse failure as 4th edition. 5th edition was the best selling RPG...

No it's a better solution. Again the core problem is that 5th edition had these good ideas but it did not want to or did not attempt to...

6 saves works just fine. People just too set in their ways to make Strength, Intelligence, and Charisma spells.

I'm not saying any of the simplicity should be seen as improvement Personally I think "hard control" spells should be either 2 checks...

Some. But fans will want Stunned, Paralyzed, Frightened, and Restrained to be similar to what that seem in real life. One or two could...

It's two fold. The spells were simplified and thus removed the barriers and limitations D&D's powerful magic could run into. The...

Mostly agree. Trouble is that the oversimplification broke a bunch of safeguards and outright removed most of the safety valves...