Minigiant's latest activity

One class would have a wide array of divination magic (wizard) One class would have a wide assortment of language magic and naturally...

It is less about explicit role and more about balance. I want someone to have the option of a real mechanical or story reason to play...

No. Not unless your subclass branches you out to it. And you still would be a blaster/controller, athlete charmer.

I would. The point is every class would have a role in combat, exploration, and social interaction. There wouldn't be super experts in...

Nope Like this ClassCategoryPrimary CombatSecondary CombatExploration Social SorcererMageBlasterControllerAthleteCharmer...

Not class fantasies. Roles I want every class that are the same category of class to provide a different role in combat. And have a...

My argument is those aren't meaningful challenges. That's the difference. In modern play you are giving the power but via resources...

The point is want them to provide different roles, weaknesses, and strengths within their class fantasies across the 3 pillars of play...

Let's give the full arcane spellcasters a d4 hit die again! :devilish:

To me, they don't Explain how? Where am I wrong?

Not good enough for me. I prefer balance across all pillars of gameplay so I can run any type of game without fudging. From intrigue...

Listen closely. A5e is 5e based. Therefore its base is too skewed to balance across pillars equally.

Can't be done with 3PP. That's my point. You'd have to design D&D from scratch to balance across all 3 pillars.

OS play isn't clever. But you are weaker You cannot power through obstacles that are supposed to be challenging without it being risky...

Ranger, Bard, Fighter Not enough for me. If you are going to care about teams exploration and social, you have to balance it...