Minigiant's latest activity

I meaned "the" first edition. 0e. When rangers had wizard spells and cleric spells. They would. Point was rangers ended up tied to...

Nah. It's because Druids didn't exist in first edition so Rangers had to get wizard spells to get some of their desired effects and...

Well that's hoping your get a lenient DM on tracking. Most quests don't have fresh tracks. and Rangers get Arrow and Blade spells from...

Because Rangers also learn from Wizards to get divination for tracking Since no one wants to use tracking rules.

That's how we got the unbalanced Class/subclass situation of clerics and wizard. If one class can get over 50% of magic, you have to...

with this much overlap, I do not think that we need more than ONE caster class. Have every spell available, but spell known to level of...

Another topic brought me back here. Why do we need the Ranger? Why do we need any class? Well they are exaggerations or realizations...

5e was designed around multi-classing being optional. The choice in 2024 of making multi-classing a base rule was a poor one...

It sounds like you were missing one of the books. No other reviews have mentioned that the set doesn't contain the actual rules. Edit...

That's a 6e discussion. Cutting and elevating some subclasses and toning down some classes. But when it comes to 5e and the wizard...

For example, some things can't be subclasses for Class Heavy classes. This is 100% the problem with conjurers and necromancers. The...

Agreed. And thus we must categorize the Class heavy, Subclass Heavy, and Balanced Influence classes.

Kinda The Subclass Heavy class like Fighter and Ranger in 2014 and 2024 are really each 3 classes mashed together because WOTC didn't...

It's bad because Fighter means nothing. Fighter shouldn't mean nothing. If half the power and most of the flavor are in the subclass...

The power budget between class and subclass is important. There needs to be enough in each to insert flavor and choose in each. Full...