Minigiant's latest activity

I don't think you believe there is a difference between "converted to with in base x edition" and "built for base x edition".

My basic sample simple setting for 5e The Empire (humans, orcs, halflings, and tieflings) The Mountain Kingdom (dwarves) The Hill...

None of the places have to suffer. A nation could have multiple species in them. In my cousin's setting the Rebellion were mostly Orcs...

And like I said in the very very beginning that the community is split between "Everything is Present and Normal" and "There is a deep...

5e is the current edition. Your comment didnt make any sense so i sought clarification. Becaus the immediate preceeding edition, and...

I don't agree For example, I teach friends who want to be DMs a simple way to make their first setting: National archetypes The...

Sigh They don't produce settings with the base material assumptions and social contracts of 2024 5e books and the mentality of its...

The 2024 5e community is fractured on mechanical expressions not setting assumptions and social contract.

It's not about settling for one. Think of it this way. Imagine if 5e was printed without magic items with attunement slots. Or with no...

The point is the official IP holder should design one. Hell they didn't even really create one solely for 2014. Strixhaven has MTG PB...

Exactly. You are correct. I missed that detail in my rush. A 2024 5e D&D customer might want something in their 2024 setting that a...

There are lore youtubers, flavor youtubers, mechanics youtubers, PC optimization youtubers, NPC optimization youtubers, monster builder...

I saw that irony, as well as trotting out the same old 1970s Christian polytheism model for region rather than doing something creative.

does anyone else see the irony in creating a 'new' 5e pantheon entirely out of old gods?

The customer base isn't fractured. Many of the grumblers are not 5e Customers. The 2024 5e customer base is mostly united under the...