Minigiant's latest activity

The reason for 6E is to have a game that fans of all of those can play together with a similar style that they prefer. Having a...

Yeah. The biggest Hurdle is nerds who refuse to have a simple caster and a complex Martials as options in the game.

Not really. You can make simple wizard, using 3.5 warlock as model. Earlier in the thread, i gave rough outline of simple wizard...

Basic: Arcanist Champion Thief Healer Advanced: Artificer Barbarian Bard Cleric Druid Fighter Monk Paladin Ranger Rogue Sorcerer...

I am serious when i said i would split them into 2 separate lines. Maybe not lines per se. More like basic as core, then advanced as add...

Pretty much this. I would reexamine and revise the classes in terms of their archetypes and playstyles. IMHO, there is a lot of legacy...

2 lines can use the same mechanical benchmarks.

dnd needs to be simple and complex from level 1. it should be players choice on how complex their PC should be.

Forest though the trees Just make simple classes and complex classes. Don't combine the Champion and Berzerker with the Battlemaster...

There's the other issue Casters have a lot of spell slots Lots of spell slots High success rate Debilitating effects Low encounters...

This is poor design because D&D spells are so strong. Attacks take several hits to meet the death flag. Spell fail. GG. Time for cleanup.

the problem i see with this is that CON is often almost as wanted for casters and if you combine it with STR then every caster who wants...

Because the DC user is extremely favored over the roller 1) the DC user always adds their Proficiency modifiers The wizard always ads...

It can. 5e proves it is not better. 8 + proficiency mod + ability mod or AC are not a good DC base vs 1d20 + proficiency mod + ability...

Because of the other uses. A wizards Spell save would be their Intelligence score. A Monk's Focus points would be her Wisdom score A...