Minigiant's latest activity

I trust their skill. I dont trust their design alignment. Like I said. D&D has 4 or more ideas of what psionics is. So there is...

Eeeehh.. You suggesting WOTC do this? Eeeeeh.... i dunno...

Most companies won't let designers do 20 surveys, each with a month or 2 roll over, unless its a major part of their profit generation...

My point is that even if they didnt do that, psionics is too split in desire for WOTC to coalesce their design around anything but...

Yup. MCDM has the Talent, A5E has both the Voidrunner's Codex psions AND @Steampunkette 's Esper from Paranormal Power, pretty sure...

Hasbro suits dont design. There is feedback from players to WOTC. The issue is the feedback for psionics splits in 4 mutually...

Thats a issue. But the biggest one is that D&D has 4 different histories for psioinics and the fans are split between about 4 ideas...

For the D&D community, psionics is like 4 very different and distinct things. So WOTC offshore the more complex ideas to 3PPs.

Well if you get rid of Slayer of X or Master of Y terrain, there isnt much left in the ranger identity worth its own class if you dont...

Slayer of Everything? Sounds like Hunter's Mark

The rub is 1) What fits the ranger modus operendi in most sources of media is not 2) What is good in D&D Its sorta like the Full...

Beastmaster Wisdom Based Combat Beast Pet focused Has Manevers Commander's Strike Distracting Strike Can speak to animals at will...

Its a bad idea to put ranger on its own schedule. That would be dang near impossible to balance. If we use Weapon Masteries, Maneuvers...

Would love to see it but dont think its possible without making ranger super complicated....Outside of doing spells. Now ironically...

This is why spells work best for D&D rangers. In most media, rangers really mostly fight their Favored enemies in their Favored...