Recent content by Morrus

Your claim to fame is that you bullied a younger child? I'm not sure this is the boast that you think it is.

So.... here's what we're going to do. You may discuss the new Harry Potter show. You may discuss why you don't want to watch it, including your stance on the creator's views if that is what makes you not want to watch it. However, please avoid the topic of whether the discussion is a valid...

And here it is. There's still more content to migrate, but this is where you'll find it: https://enpublishingrpg.com/pages/woin

The reason it's not copyrightable (not might, it's not) is because copyright is limited to human-created art, and the (US) courts have ruled that AI art does not qualify because it is not human-created.

Ram Singh Chauhan

Panayot Hitov

Count Gaishi Nagaoka

A new card game, and the first in a series of solo gamebooks!

Livestreaming as always Friday at 2pm UK time (9am Eastern)! In this week's show we'll take a look Jeff Easley's cover art for the new Greyhawk book, play with D&D Beyond's character 'quickbuilder' and reveal news of new Dragonlance novels from Weis & Hickman! Melf's Guide to Greyhawk Cover...

But who can you sell it to? Who can afford it, and what use would they have for 92 antiprotons?

These are just your own made up definitions, though.

There’s no difference between a prompt and what you calll a “direction”.

Something new is not being created by the human. The ‘something’ is not new, and also it’s not created and it’s also not by the human. The only correct bit of that phrase is the word “something”. “New”, “created”, and “human” do not belong there. But we’ve been over this a hundred times...

You lost me! You don’t not think not would have? :D

They tried that and people didn’t like it.