Muh's latest activity
-
Muh reacted to Eubani's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with
Like.
I am sure there is a rpg based logical fallacy that states that just because a DM can fix an issue, does not mean there is no issue. So... -
Muh reacted to FrozenNorth's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
You haven’t responded to any of my prompts of situations where casters can simply short-circuit encounters. It would be a lot easier...
-
Muh reacted to Zubatcarteira's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
I find that martials vs casters discussions often just default to Fighter vs Wizard arguments, so I'd like to share my experience...
-
Muh reacted to FrozenNorth's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
No, it was not obvious. In the initial post, you referred to “situations”. I understood this to mean encounters, not adventures. From...
-
Muh reacted to FrozenNorth's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
Ach, no TRUE Scotsman creates encounters that can be bypassed by scry, invisibility, speak with dead, Leomund’s Tiny Hut, Polymorph etc.
-
Muh reacted to Crimson Longinus's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
Indeed. Or perhaps the rules writer who puts in the game spells that completely bypass huge chunks of potential adventure types is the...
-
Muh reacted to FrozenNorth's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
No, they don’t. The DM has narrative control in the fighter case: if the bandits are not already in line of sight (so the fiction was...
-
Muh reacted to Mort's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
You missed the point of the post. The wizard's action (feather fall) is met with no issue. The Barbarian's action is met with...
-
Muh reacted to Minigiant's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
Again no other options. It's not like some games where the brute, knight, barbarian, rune warrior, magic warrior, magic archer, and...
-
Muh reacted to Mort's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
Really, There are plenty of DMs who take great pride in designing their adventures with expressly NOT taking specific characters and...
-
Muh reacted to Minigiant's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
That's because 95% OF NONMAGICAL WARRIORS are forced to be Fighters and ALL EXPERTS must be rogues. It's less about popularity and...
-
Muh reacted to Mind of tempest's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
okay, but why make the casters complex and the martials simple?
-
Muh reacted to ph0rk's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
As I see the quote, that's still in keeping with it. Wall of Stone does what building a stone wall would do, but much much faster. You...
-
Muh reacted to ph0rk's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
My argument has been that their list of options does not change very much (if at all) throughout their career (and so in the later tiers...
-
Muh reacted to Minigiant's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) Martials v Casters...I still don't *get* it. with Like.
It's not about turning warriors into casters by default. It's about giving martial characters options for certain groups or creating a...