Parmandur's latest activity

It does beg the question: did Greyhawk not have dwarven wizards because that was an intrinsic part of the setting or was it because that...

But what is a setting supposed to say about the existence of dwarf wizards when the original pretense of there NOT being dwarf wizards...

I don't see why we can't blame both the writer and the editors.

...i don't have the 5.24 ruleset, but from the 5.14 basic rules introduction to classes... ...it's an asymmetrical ruleset, with one...

What about Kong of Dragon Pass...?

I'm as surprised as you are.

What, questionable logic and writing??? In a TSR product from the late 1980s?????

Yes, because NPCs are not player characters. The character creation rules exist as rules targeting how Players create Characters...

But remember, Tolkien was NOT a major influence on D&D. Despite the elves, dwarves, hobbits, ents, balrogs, wraiths, and Arag… erm I...

I would like to have a new setting but I don’t think it’s needed.

Many Arrows itself is also talked about in the book. Orrusk Homebringer for example is mentioned as not being related to the line of...

Just to go back to this bit. When James Wyatt got the opportunity to actually make Ravnica into a Magic book, the Magic worldbuilding...

Personally, I'm not against it, but I don't really see much of a point in doing so. It would have to really bring something new to the...

But those mechanics are for heroes, not the normies. That's part of the 5e premise. The setting you're suggesting ignores one of the...

It is interesting how they interact, but always mechani s are at the service of a story, the Setting is what inform the use of...