Paul Farquhar's latest activity

AFAICT, the whole reason for "backwards compatibility" was to keep the Adventures in print without needing to revise them. It's part of...

I don't entirely disagree with you, but there's no need to rewrite lore - as far as I can tell, Orcs have done everything that they have...

This is an example of the “presentation” issues that 4e had. The way the rules explained things certainly gave that impression. I’m...

They can replace the out-of-combat stuff a wizard does if your party is stuck with a “I only blow sh*t up” sorcerer. They also share...

You could throw twenty tarasques at the party and it still wouldn’t be a particularly difficult encounter. But that’s because combat...

I guess that just shows that different people like different stuff. I enjoyed conversing with the villagers, who were quite well...

Have done that, but found it’s not necessary. Four characters can just as easily handle combat encounters as five. It’s still easy. It...

I played it when it first came out, didn’t finish it though, after leaving the village it very quickly got boring. It tries to be far...

Here is an interesting observation: a player doesn’t make it to the session, so their character sits it out. The combat encounters are...

And significantly worse than the previous.

With floppy hair and shadowed eyes? It's a very old cliché.

It came out in September, so it could have been (and probably was since I ran it soon after it came out).

Or disinterest. Isn’t the eyeshadow and floppy hair warlock a rather dated cliche? I remember taking the micky out of it whist I was...

Pretty sure when it does my computer wont be able to run it. More interested in the tabletop game.

Sure, that's pretty much how they were in 2nd and 3rd edition.