Recent content by Rabulias

You can request Google blur your house from Google Maps Street View, but if you do, it is usually permanent, even if someone else buys your house. :oops:

I know, right? It should be Quid Cashman. 🤣

Agreed. I think O-Chul will rotate Sunny so their eyestalks point at Nale and company.

I think Brazil gets more lightning strikes than any other country. The most common single location for lightning strikes is Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela, which is just north of Brazil. But putting it there might be... problematic at the moment.

That was from Dragon Magazine 110 (June 1986) p.97.

I think George Lucas saw Maul surviving in some form after The Phantom Menace as early as production on Revenge of the Sith. They considered making General Grievous be Maul's remains. The animatics for some deleted scenes show Maul's face behind Grievous's mask. I am glad they did not go that...

Yeah. Contrived as it is though, it beats saying "Somehow Maul returned."

You would have to watch the Clone Wars series for the full back story, but I know you are on record as not wishing to watch all of that. In short, the Force/sheer will/hate/anger kept Maul alive after being bisected in The Phantom Menace. He was then scooped up with trash and sent to a garbage...

Awesome project all around. The precision was amazing. They were able to predict the point of splashdown to the freaking minute! :oops:

And daughter of actor Donald Pleasance.

Yeah, if anyone was within earshot of Robby and Duke there, Robby would be in that psych hold. :confused: Hard to explain those comments away.

No, I do not believe it is practically achievable for Wikipedia to be 100% accurate. But if a Wikipedia page is known to be accurate as of a certain date and it has not been edited since that date, it can be relied upon. Every response from an LLM AI needs to be double-checked every time. Also...

You are comparing apples and oranges here. Large-scale fusion power is still a theoretical industry. Human editing/oversight of Wikipedia is a fact and is happening today. The question of the site's accuracy is simply a matter of how many people are brought to bear on the problem. That is the...

Wikipedia could theoretically be 100% accurate. According to a study by OpenAI last fall, even when LLMs are trained on perfect data, hallucinations are mathematically inevitable, and that cannot be corrected. So there is an inherent limit to accuracy for LLM AI.

Has the 2024 PHB gotten a 2nd printing with errata yet?