Reynard's latest activity

My solution of the legendary monster being a composite creature worked very well for me.

I am curious what 5E tools you are talking about. 5E is notoriously light on maneuvers and other adhoc abilities that allow monsters to...

Also, it is not the 5e24 PCs that are the issue IME. It is that A5e monsters are generally weaker than 5e24 monsters at higher levels...

Legendary resistance and legendary actions do not serve the same purpose design wise.

I am STILL sad that when they announced Star Wars Saga Edition they did not mean Star Wars SAGA Edition. Such potential wasted.

Marvel Super Heroes Adventure Game (using the SAGA card system) even if it needs to be re-printed without any Marvel branding.

I agree that the power bump for PCs in the 2024 rules means you have to tream them as a level or two higher when using the A5E encounter...

What I would want to do is allow multiple groups to explore and engage in the larger sandbox, and to have their antics change those...

they both publish one setting only, it would be weird for them to have options that they exclude from that setting

Do you know how they managed to coordinate?

For clarity, I meant multiple GMs, not just one GM running multiple groups.

I get that it is a useful thing to do for them to show how to convert from 5E to DH, but it is the absolute last thing I care about.

Maybe, but remember we are talking about personal preferences here, not what we think WotC would or should do.

It does it at the cost of extra rules and more things to keep track of though. That was ultimately my player's feedback after our A5e...

The monster design at least is, for both. I am less familiar with or concerned about the player facing stuff.