Ridcully's latest activity
-
RRidcully reacted to Whizbang Dustyboots's post in the thread Wizards of the Coast Head Explains Benefits to D&D Franchise Model with
Like.
No, they didn't. People online decided that's what "monetization" meant, despite zero evidence. -
RRidcully reacted to Clint_L's post in the thread Wizards of the Coast Head Explains Benefits to D&D Franchise Model with Like.
I love that online play is an option when necessary, but agree that in-person play should be the priority. I think that having people...
-
RI was one of those folks who didn't like the shift away from racial stat boosts, at first. I didn't like the optional flexibility rule...
-
RRidcully reacted to Chaltab's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
Basically this. Ever since the OGL crisis, some channels have gone off the deep end in terms of trying to spin everything D&D related as...
-
RRidcully reacted to AlViking's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
But there's a big difference between paying someone for a setting book and "bribing" them. The folks behind CR enjoy playing multiple...
-
RRidcully reacted to SkidAce's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
Probably should be a separate thread, but from the perspective of playing from the early 80s to now, and watching social interactions...
-
RRidcully reacted to thatOneLinuxDM's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
Yeah, it's definitely not life or death. I'm personally unconvinced by the claim that Daggerheart is doing extremely well because...
-
RRidcully reacted to Umbran's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
As you yourself then noted, that wouldn't be the scenario. With 5e in Creative Commons, you can have professional support even if WotC...
-
RRidcully reacted to Reynard's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
Who is, of course, unimpeachably unbiased.
-
RRidcully reacted to Umbran's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
Let us not pretend any of us really knows how many people are actually playing in any given month. We don't.
-
RRidcully reacted to GarrettKP's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
That is impossible. The games I’m talking about were Legends of Greyhawk, the new organized play campaign that is 2024 only. They had an...
-
RRidcully reacted to Staffan's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with
Haha.
-
RRidcully reacted to Clint_L's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
With regards to the OP, I'm not surprised. Daggerheart is not really built for long campaigns, but beyond that, its brand recognition is...
-
RRidcully reacted to Necropolitan's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
It's really unfortunate to hear that Daggerheart is such an awful RPG that even the people who created it won't play it and it's going...
-
RRidcully reacted to Afroconan's post in the thread Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players with Like.
How? Isn't the game fun? Who said they arent using it? Age of Umbra's still a thing and it will be ongoing. Why does it matter if they...