Ruin Explorer's latest activity

Even this raises massive, massive questions, because which "Arthurian fantasy"? Arthurian fantasies vary insanely, there's no one...

Sure but the context you're using remains exceptionally tough, and that naturally leads to highly valuing CC spells. The other thing...

The issue is that some people are stuck in this mindset where no-one who doesn't have completely explicit magical powers can do anything...

Why not? You allow it with one kind of supernatural power. Why not another?

I think that's because ENworld is extremely, extremely un-representative of 5E players as a whole, based on I dunno, anywhere which...

This is an interesting opinion, because it's all about context, and I think the context you provide is, imho, rather unusual. 3...

That's very high in my experience. Monsters are usually more spread out than that.

Then I will simply stop replying to them.

I kinda wish @EzekielRaiden and @Zardnaar would read the thread title and OP again.

You could do that, but is that something people who play D&D specifically actually want? Is that something that the majority of the 30m+...

Like I said, this is to me staggeringly petty. It's just explicit vs. implicit - there's nothing more to it. The RP thing is totally...

Did you play D&D or Dark Sun in the 2e era? Comments like these make it seem very much like you did not. Not only that… the setting...

Back in 2e (I think this was as early as Dragon Kings, but I could be misremembering and can't be hedgehogged to check), the notion was...

We're talking about a voluntary leisure activity - game play - based around creating a shared fiction. So how can it be anything other...

This just is simply factually not true. Why say something that is so easy to prove isn't true? Can you explain? Also rule 0 means...