Ruin Explorer's latest activity

You can't have it both ways. Either things need to be consistent, have a basis, and be possible to explain within the setting or that...

That's not weird, I support that strongly!

It's an incredibly weird hill to die on but by gum, my original series Rock Lords and I will die on it

I don't think that tracks at all. I don't think, based on the history of RPG design, there's any reason to think people who started with...

I mean it is a contradiction, on the other hand, it is how they said they designed and balanced 5E 2014. They went on and on and on and...

??? Why the heck would all else be equal? That's a nonsensical opinion because learning that trick isn't free. It's as hard or...

Replace them with a Warrior class that can be armoured or unarmoured and armed or unarmed (primarily via subclasses), and uses Focus or...

When exactly did you start playing though? From previous discussions, the vast majority of people on ENworld seem to have started in...

...I don't think that's the point. Magic makes you more powerful than not having magic. But so does being really good at fighting.

Because it lets you do things you couldn't otherwise do, duh. That's how magic works in tons and tons of fantasy settings. Being able to...

I will be astonished if 6E is backwards compatible. It does mean they have to wait longer to do a new edition, but still not very long...

I hope you're right. A noncompatible 6e would really be great for me.

I mean your entire argument collapses because you used this word, especially about magic, which is arbitrarily powerful. It's as...

??? So it as cool when you were 12 but is "a sad commentary" when you're like, what, 60?

Yeah, given that the primary target market is 12 year olds, who were now born almost at the same time 5E came out... WotC doesn't need...