Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
What's New?
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Rushbolt's latest activity
Rushbolt
reacted to
MNblockhead's post
in the thread
Gen Con Staying in Indianapolis through 2030
with
Like
.
Why not take the approach that PAX does? E.g., Gencon Prime (Indianapolis), Gencon West, Gencon East, and Gencon South?
Jul 23, 2025
Rushbolt
posted the thread
D&D General
10 Year Anniversary of Curse of Strahd
in
*Dungeons & Dragons
.
Just speculation here, but it appears any new Ravenloft campaign book won't be out by Halloween since the October release is a Stranger...
Jul 22, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
Argyle King's post
in the thread
Dungeons & Dragons Shifts to Franchise Model, Dan Ayoub Named as Head
with
Like
.
Perhaps, but that needn't be assumed. The rights to how, what, when, and where you can use all or only some of an IP can be complex. An...
Jul 16, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
Whizbang Dustyboots's post
in the thread
Dungeons & Dragons Shifts to Franchise Model, Dan Ayoub Named as Head
with
Like
.
Larian was 100% clear on what was happening in early access. The fact that it went on to be an even bigger hit than expected was a...
Jul 16, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
robowieland's post
in the thread
Dungeons & Dragons Shifts to Franchise Model, Dan Ayoub Named as Head
with
Like
.
Seems like they might go back to what they did at the top of 5e where they contracted out work to publishers like Green Robin and Kobold...
Jul 16, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
AlViking's post
in the thread
Dungeons & Dragons Shifts to Franchise Model, Dan Ayoub Named as Head
with
Like
.
Sounds like they want to license out more official D&D products to third parties instead of trying to do things in house. I don't see...
Jul 16, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
Anthro78's post
in the thread
Dungeons & Dragons Shifts to Franchise Model, Dan Ayoub Named as Head
with
Like
.
I don't fully understand what this means, but it being Hasbro, I await the inevitable downside.
Jul 16, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
Minigiant's post
in the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
with
Like
.
It's not complexity It's Move Zombie #1 Choose Zombie #1's Attack Roll Attack and Damage Move Zombie #2 Choose Zombie #2's Attack Roll...
Jul 11, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
SkidAce's post
in the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
with
Like
.
not if "in combat only" once you have more than two of them they are treated as a horde/army. out of combat they carry the box. Not...
Jul 10, 2025
Rushbolt
replied to the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
.
I haven't played this class yet, but all the features this class gets seem way to strong for the class to remain a full caster. Part of...
Jul 9, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
TiQuinn's post
in the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
with
Like
.
To my mind, the horde necromancer is the BBEG. It’s an NPC antagonist archetype in virtually every media I’ve seen, not a protagonist...
Jul 9, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
FrogReaver's post
in the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
with
Like
.
Problem: Necromancer fans want many permanent minions but many permanent minions makes for poor ttrpg gameplay for many reasons. Slow...
Jul 9, 2025
Rushbolt
replied to the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
.
I also like the Necromancer class by Mage Hand Press. I feel it does a better job at bringing the Necromancer minion fantasy. I think...
Jul 7, 2025
Rushbolt
reacted to
DEFCON 1's post
in the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
with
Like
.
The Necromancer is like the Psion and the Warlord... every person has a different idea about what it should do and how it should be...
Jul 7, 2025
Rushbolt
replied to the thread
D&D 5E (2024)
The Undead Army Necromancer is not Designable
.
I have to acknowledge that you are correct. I should have said designable for balance and playability. I went for too short of a title.
Jul 7, 2025
Top