SableWyvern's latest activity

If someone can't take rejection, I would encourage them to continue to develop games that match their inspiration and vision, rather...

That's not the position you've been arguing.

So, this is all pretty much just what I've been saying. However, unless there is an established group, I don't believe there is any such...

As close to what borderline? No one inherently has any turf, beyond what's agreed on up front. If the group agrees to play a game where...

No one is forcing anyone to do anything. As you yourself just pointed out, either side can walk. If I'm only interested in running a...

Frankly, thats not what you are saying. The setting is what defines the options available. The players choose from the options...

No, there isn't. There may be general expectations as to what's typically involved in a game of D&D. But there is no "contract" of any...

Maybe I should have finished reading the thread before replying, was not intending on belaboring a point, is/was honest question.

There is no universal "D&D social contract" that anyone is beholden to. A social contract is formed by the people at the table actually...

Adding things just because you adhere some axiom that says you must is liable to result in some incoherent settings. Mongoose d20 Conan...

If people can only enjoy a game if there plenty of options to pick from, that's certainly their prerogative. We like what we like, and...

No its still the ideal. Just because its easy (and it very obviously is) to add to it, does not mean that its foundation is not the...

Behold, the platonic ideal. 6 Ancestry options, 4 Classes. Even with your hypothetical restrictions? Plenty. Thousands of...

I think you are taking that to an extreme. Having different rules doesn't necessarily mean lots of things being restricted or cut (or...

It's good to know what your own requirements are so no one's time is wasted: not everyone is going to be a fit for every table. TTRPGs...