Recent content by SkidAce

Because their character would? (Or not if playing a character that wanted power without personal repercussions)

Re: bolded (emphasis mine); We felt those rules caused players to think in ways inherent to that setting and caused different play, with interesting choices and decisions emerging. All how you look at it I guess.

Sometimes "a little more explicitly abstract" is the little more that tips things over into discontent. Everyone usually has a line or spectrum of these feels, and everyone's tolerance level is different and valid.

I hear you and agree, but as always it varies; just last night.... Noob characters for a christmas oneshot with DM in training. 1st level bard player accidently makes 2024 character, the rest are 2014. Bard casts Truestrike and talks their way through the attack. Player of the Ranger (who...

Im kinda astonished that I would be changing their sheets, but everyone does things differently, so its on me.

Yes. :)

This has always been my position.

Quoted for cosmic truth. If I could thumbs up more than once I would... (y)(y)

Well said. I consider 20+ to be getting in demi-go range (or supernatural if you will).

Yeah, i was trying to say this also many pages ago.

I was going to say, I kinda agreed with them about the 21 strength for an NPC guard. Most of my npcs are low level, rarely reaching higher than 3rd. But then I did my research and saw it was a CR 10 creature...and well, I could use that for a unique NPC champion of the army, so in that context...

....oooo... let me guess. Low Character Death?

While mostly about balance (and the effect of extreme chaos and law, evil also was a viewpoint. Said Stormbringer, book 6.

Magical supercharged carmageddon for the win.