Recent content by SkidAce

I did not say 2e was a failure. Im saying after time and poor decisions it became one. I.e. not an edition issue,

IMO, releasing 2E was a successful decision, it was the splat overload, too many settings lines, etc, that was the bad decision. I.e. overloading the demand for product to the extent that "average" players had to choose what to buy out of the multitudes of choices.

No for redoing older books to 2024. Yes for new books coming out for 2024.

What level did they get it?* *I've never played AL, so am curious

I had a "semi gothic" campaign where the devils were like rakshasa, immune to spell levels X and below. And magic weapons were rarer than standard. A certain amount of telegraphing was needed "The cultists seem to have acquired a book of summoning lower level devils" It was fun for an...

"But we just sat down?" Hehe.

Addendum: You could still have creatures that had resistance/immunity to "magical" weapons, I just wouldnt put that and "silver" on the same creature.

I have thought that perhaps the +1, +2 of "magic" weapons is merely magically enhanced accuracy and damage (a valuable attribute to be sure), but that it does not affect resistances to type or material.* I.e. A weapon would still need silver to affect jackalweres, even if it was a +1. *the...

I was there also. But it doesnt matter, no worries.

Thank you.

Thata not what i remember him saying when it was done. The leadership didnt want it but he convinced them. YMMV

Exactly, and he created it to ensure we would never lose access.

I think Ryan Dancy may disagree.

And no, not all Kyrieans would have that background. Because to some, occupation is more important than culture. In representing their character. YMMV.

Except when my player says, "My former professions are not important, I want to focus on the fact that I came from this culture instead." So I created them a "Cultural Background" (2014 rules) Native Kyriean You come from a country that has a wide spread usage of low-level magic, and are more...