SlyFlourish's latest activity

It's also worth noting that the increases costs of printing and the prevalence of online storefronts make the market a very different...

One of my groups is playing 2024 characters in a mod I created using the 2014 rules. Haven't had to do much except bump up the...

I'm playing a mostly 2024 game, with one 2014 subclass (Bladesinger), in Curse of Strahd, with no issues. As much as I would of like...

That's a good point. 3PPs were all 'trained' not to do that by the OGL, and that's been ingrained over 20+ years. But CC is a different...

(The usual disclaimer about seeking advice from an actual lawyer before making business decisions.) Generally speaking, you’re free to...

It is clearer to say, "compatible with D&D 2024", or similar.

That was the OGL, yeah. I don't think there's any such terminology in Creative Commons.

I'd still avoid it using it on the cover, but it's probably fine to use it on a compatibility page. Really the only reason you couldn't...

Of course not, but most companies don't want their consumers giving any thought to products they no longer sell or support.

that is what I meant though, you can add additional elements / rooms with their own benefits without replicating the WotC bastion rules...

Hopefully it is a case on bastions that they're going to sit on it a short while (possibly to see what sort of feedback they get...

5e is the overarching open ruleset platform now. A bunch of games are built off of that platform including: 1. Level Up Advanced 5e (or...

Yeah, but it's wrong. ;)

One thing to consider, which I considered when I put out my own CC documents, is that it's a big risk to put anything into the CC...

I wasn't clear. I meant that SRDs are there for publishers, not customers.