Recent content by Snute

Exactly. And I think that is how Matt and crew use the name when they say "nerdy-ass voice actors playing Dungeons & Dragons" and how the public perceives it (or at least I do) -> not as an endorsement of the brand D&D specifically but of the great hobby TTRPG as a whole.

Bummer, I hoped it would be Daggerheart. Whatever, more important is the story and chemistry of the cast, it will still be good I'm sure.

It means that they sold through their (Darrington Press or rather their distributor) stock, either directly to customers or FLGS. They likely do not have the means to track every FLGS inventory. No fudging of numbers involved.

I wouldn't interpret too much into the snow-covered mountains, I think that part is a clear reference to the Elder Scrolls VI announcement trailer. That trailer didn't show anything about the game and was just a floating VI over some mountains, which has been mocked as a way too premature...

As someone playing a Rune Knight currently: yeah, you are desperately starved for Bonus Actions and/or Reactions, depending on your choices as is. The new rules look like they will only add to the messed up action economy of this subclass.

I think you might be overestimating the rules impact on the CR experience. Most watchers are likely in it for the world buiding, story and foremost the characters. The rules have always taken a backseat for CR.

Am I the only one that really does not like the multiverse angle they keep pushing? I like my settings separated, without the cosmology of one influencing the other.

Kobolds, Dragons and Worms are mythological creatures, to which WotC certainly does not have any claim whatsoever. Drow and Duergar are, afaik, indeed claims they have.

Kobolds, Dragons and Worms are mythological creatures, to which WotC certainly does not have any claim whatsoever. Drow and Duergar are, afaik, indeed claims they have.