soviet's latest activity

Good gods, people don't read my posts. I'm not talking about what happens when there's a conflict between what the players want and...

I think there should be space for Greg Stafford for Pendragon alone.

Not the suggestion I was making. I'm not suggesting disruptive. I'm suggesting something you may have distaste for, but everyone else...

You are. I've said so. Numerous times. But other people are too. Which means sometimes, again SOMEtimes, you'll have to choose not to...

And yet your phrasing suggests that any time you have a preference in conflict with your players, you automatically get to be the one...

Surely, but the issue keeps coming down to your happiness seems to trump anyone else's.

If the fun of everyone comes first, then why is it you cannot accept something that isn't fun for you, but would be fun for others?

This again assumes a GM somehow can never deal with anything they may be unhappy about. There are going to be some brightline issues...

You are all young tortles, freshly hatched. You all start on the beach, far from the ocean. Next to you is a wooden chest, possibly...

No, but the GM that says, 'only Tortlemen' certainly is. They would have my undying respect.

You know, aside from looking kind of dopey and comedic, the Bakshi version still captured Sam's essential character.

"It's a fantasy world, Steve! You can't just name your character Tom! It breaks my verisimilitude!"

He was entitled. All that poetry and making up stuff about the gameworld. Mainly the poetry.

But then there was that one guy who wanted join the game to play an "enigmatic force of nature". He was extremely quirky, totally OP...

So true. His original plans was to keep the setting to Tolkien races only. Never let your players buy the "Metaphors for Moral...