tetrasodium's latest activity

IoW the RoLePlAyInG behind tiefling "lore" is so shallow that dropping from the MToF S+ choice for the broken OP charisma based warlock...

While there are elements very central to almost every cultivation/wuxia/xianxia∆ LN I've read that would very much help with running 5e...

if anything, the revised classes of 2024 were not revised enough. if my old PHB was not a salad by 2024, I would not bother with buying...

Yes I was. Again the last line in thew following linked post. You can keep denying, but it is right there if you click on the post...

What edition are you talking about where +2 charisma+1 second attrib is "poor"? tieflings are popular be they are mechanically strong...

This is silly. Playable drow had innate SR, it was a huge mechanical boon almost impossible for most builds to gain mechanically not...

Something completely new. Its still in nascant stages (the devs are greyboxing it), but its unclear if it will be 2d6 or 2d10 system...

Yes.... And? That was my original point before you jumped in. You picked a bone over the idea that tiefling popularity was due to lore...

Cross reference tiefling and warlock compared to tiefling and the other charisma glasses 2018 data (couldn't find the original ddb...

Tiefling wasn't the part that broke warlock multiclass grab bag builds giving it resistance with maxed starting cha was enough for their...

Tiefling wasn't the part that broke warlock multiclass grab bag builds giving it resistance with maxed starting cha was enough for their...

The first problem is in an attempt to defend your position you take a statement from a dated manual out of context and interpret it in a...

I agree, it was notable though because the thing described was more an excuse to continue justifying the elimination of death spiral by...

Yet when NPC adventurers of the same capabilities are the PCs' foes those NPCs should be easy to kill? No. What works for one works...

The problem isn't that you're quoting the rules and using them to defend your position. The problem is that the rules you're quoting...