tetrasodium's latest activity
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) Drawbacks to Increasing Monster AC Across the Board?.You are claiming that there is a higher volume of math needed during a player's turn with the iterative attack penalty... the only way... -
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) Drawbacks to Increasing Monster AC Across the Board?.You obviously haven't been following along. The timesink isn't from determining if an attack hits, that comes in the form of pumping...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) Drawbacks to Increasing Monster AC Across the Board?.Barbie might have said it, but it was never true & neither was any of this hand wringing used to justify approaching a multi player team...
-
-
-
tetrasodium reacted to Henadic Theologian's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) What upcoming WotC D&D product are you excited about? with
Haha.
Hey that's one way to save time 🤪 -
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) Drawbacks to Increasing Monster AC Across the Board?.Every time I see someone express this sentiment I feel the desire to comment about the fact that few tables are one gm one player and...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Eyes of Nine's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) What upcoming WotC D&D product are you excited about? with
Like.
I am finding the poll numbers very interesting at this point, 4-5 days in. Dragon Delves at 18.6%; and the rest within roughly 10 points... -
tetrasodium reacted to Yaarel's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
This Reddit mentions some of the feedback for 2023 UA Playtest 5. It notes that they chose not to standardize subclass progression −...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Yaarel's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
In the 2023 Playtest 6, there is a side note saying: "Bard subclass levels now match the level progression in the 2014 Bard, ensuring...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Yaarel's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
That is my memory too. Looking back at the 2023 UA Playtest 6 that describes the future Bard class, it is "missing" the subclass level...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".Could be true, but it was never polled & the complaints posted took the form of what I described
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".I think you could be talking about a few different things but.... It never got polled. I remember not even realizing that they...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Yaarel's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
Do you remember exactly how the survey for subclass levels was worded? And what percentage the response had for that wording? One of...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) What upcoming WotC D&D product are you excited about? with Like.
About time some other setting other than the Forgotten Realms got a chance to be the default. ;) I hope we get to see the 2024 version...
-
I don’t misunderstand your point, I disagree with it. No matter how many times you repeat it!
