tetrasodium's latest activity

Good lord, what is this, a Star Wars sequel trilogy?

I think post MiC it was pretty decent once the gm was equipped with things like conceptual /metaphorical components (ie the sigh of a...

Have you ever heard of an exquisite corpse? Unless a piece of media is being made under auteur theory, there are dozens if not hundreds...

The 5.0 ranger was bad. It was designed for people who dont and wouldn't switch to 5e. 5.1 (post tasha) was okay. The 5.5 ranger is...

6th Edition confirmed!

Full presentation: https://investor.hasbro.com/static-files/8cd9c02e-388e-4d85-8c35-e9d21dbe21bb 8-K (Current Events) Filing...

I linked to the Perkins tweet about magic items because they are that important & I wasn't about to go find the crawford video clip...

i don't think ranger NEEDS a core mechanic, as previously said, the ranger concept covers a wide array of thematic options, so as a...

This thread exploded six pages last night but I've done a lot of math across my various 5e tables over the years & never noticed any...

Thats the mindset that misses the point. You're not wasting anything by not casting Hunters Mark first. You cast Hunter's Mark when...

Yes exactly. The "problem" is that the damage increase is in the subclass, and tgus harder to see, and well the subclass must be done...

The mistake many make is they are treating a 1st level spell as your goto passed level 9. In tier 3, Hunters Mark is your backup spell.

At first glance, and without doing any math, I honestly think this would make the Ranger the hands-down highest damage dealer in the game.

I think everyone is just assuming the Ranger is bad at level 11 and aren't doing the math. The Paladin gets +1d8 "on every attack". That...

The problem with hunters Mark is it should not be a spell in the first place. It should be a class feature that you can use a number of...