tetrasodium's latest activity

Right, so extrapolate on a Paladin spitting on their cosmic powered, source of their power, oath.

So in your game the players decide the consequences of their actions?

No, because it's an obviously bad idea to write the rules assuming that jerk DMs are the norm. Also the Standford Prison Experiment...

It's pretty simple but I can fill in a what for that bold bit. Don't think too hard on it, there probably wasn't too much thinking...

To a degree yes, but it was more about the impact of putting people into groups and having one group in power with the minimal rules...

As I said, class fluff is suggestions, not rules, which is why so much of it is contradictory, and there are a great many different ways...

Nope. The DM's the one doing all the work, if a player's so entitled that the possibility of their character facing consequences for...

I wanted to play a warlock in a really low-level game whose Blade Pact was an evil butterknife. When play starts they've just managed to...

Lol, I thought you were going to say "wonder if they'll be old enough to appreciate WotC's next release announcement"

I'll say it again: The WHOLE POINT of making 2024 "backwards compatible" was to NOT do this!

I was about to agree with you, but on further reflection, I think you're mistaken. I think that (in spite of your attempts otherwise)...

I would go the opposite way. Get rid of Counterspell as a spell. Instead, allow appropriate spells (either the same spell or something...

An at-will counter to spellcasters' go-to resource with no expenditure of resources? No thanks. Cantrips are too important to simply get...

Yup. The 5e version does but it also sandbags the GM when it comes to the patron actually doing that because every interaction can...

There is no better. At least not from a stopping jerks from being jerks standpoint. Write me a rule that if I were a jerk I couldn't...