tetrasodium's latest activity

Ah, see I just never accepted their party line. "Do not believe your eyes, trust us." is just not going to cut it these days. I'm not...

...the main reason i liked 5.14 and 5.24 is because the updated SRDs are versions 5.1 and 5.2, respectively: also it shuts up "it's all...

I think 100% compatible was always an objectively wrong description (looking at you Shepherd Druid, Warlock Pacts becoming Invocations...

It isn't all compatible. There were reams of different rules for Classes, Backgrounds, spells, and the like between editions. You could...

Man, it must really suck to see something you value get shouted down by the loudest group. I wouldn't know anything about that though...

I honestly don't really care what it's called.

This. I was kinda blown away the D&D team didn't anticipate the problem created by refusing to give a clear label to the revised rules...

Why would it? Especially when the linked FAQ reiterates that D&D 5.5e is fully compatible with D&D 5.0e? It's just a nomenclature...

And this matters ... because? All the old stuff is still compatible, I don't really care what label is used.

That's hardly a revelation given that I made sure to include the footer at the bottom affirming that very thing. Nit exactly a big...

Multiple posters told you that it was said. The same was true of the announcement tweet. This is an "explicit rule" too. Which page...

Yes. Explicitly clear Is Jeremy Crawford in the weapon mastery announcement video itself not authoritative enough source for you on...

Something else, like making the bonus action attack from Dual Wielder.

Why wouldn’t a rogue be able to juggle weapons? Between the Nick mastery and the Dual Wielder feat, a rogue can make three different...