Theory of Games's latest activity

Okay. I respect your knowledge of ttrpgs and your polite conversation. Always. Even when you're wrong. Like now.

Well. Let's not go crazy here. Profitability is the finish line IMO and marketing can drive popularity which can drive profits. But...

People still play 3e, 3.5 and PF1e. You can find those games being played all across the internet (live streams and Play-by-Post). So...

… but part of D&D’s identity is this commitment to the six abilities. My impression is that many players don’t want designers to advance...

I accept any jewelry or gems the players give me as payment for my hard work providing them with excellent adventures. :p

I addressed this a few posts up, it does nothing innovative outside a creative use of the SRD. To me this is about innovation in TTRPG...

Ok ... but if they have spell-like "non-magical abilities" and capabilities that (at a glance) resemble Feats, is that an Everyman...

What's cool is when people are allowed to disagree. You disagree with me. Cool. I disagree with the OP. Why can't I be cool too...

Warlocks and Sorcerers have POWER. Characters don't need exceptional training if they can blow up orks with magic. This "Everyman" is...

I'd argue that the last one was a trailer, too. But they say it's a teaser. So I proclaim this a teapot, since we're just randomly using...

I've never seen balance as all that important. I care far more about accurate (within practical limits) modeling of aspects of the fiction.

I'd describe the gems (color, size) and OOC allow PCs skilled in Appraisal or something close (being a Dwarf) to make a roll to...

Ah, but IT IS thought-policing, by definition. Not my rule ...

You are not delivering anyones message but your own. I’ll leave it at we see things entirely differently.

By that logic it’s Brownsteins all the way down and nothing else matters.