Theory of Games's latest activity
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class.After reading and comparing to older editions, I'd remove somatic requirements because they don't make sense. A bound Psychic should... -
Theory of Games reacted to dave2008's post in the thread D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class with
Like.
I will disagree with that. I don't feel D&D needs psionics at all. I don't mind if people want and enjoy psionics, but it is definitely... -
Theory of Games replied to the thread D&D 5E (2024) Illusion Magic in 2024.The "problem" here is Kobold Stew doesn't understand the definition of how characters interact with illusions. It isn't a problem with...
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread D&D General 1s and 20s: D&D's Narrative Mechanics.It's always an issue when people aren't sure what the OP is exactly about. Again, it's why I stress the importance of terminology.
-
Theory of Games reacted to Micah Sweet's post in the thread D&D General 1s and 20s: D&D's Narrative Mechanics with Like.
I certainly hope so, but somehow I doubt it.
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread Worlds of Design: Battle Maneuvers.I mean .... all of it is silly :ROFLMAO:
-
Theory of Games reacted to Mind of tempest's post in the thread D&D General Psionic species and subspecies, will they make a comeback too? with Like.
true, but we like having races who love certain classes, it is just a thing people like.
-
Theory of Games reacted to TheSword's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) Illusion Magic in 2024 with Like.
@FrogReaver is spot on. On your turn you can move the illusion in a set way but there is nothing that lets you move the illusion on...
-
Theory of Games reacted to kigmatzomat's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) Illusion Magic in 2024 with Like.
What RAW? Their movement rate by RAW is immense. Since range is 120ft, that's up to 240ft of movement. Hmm. Seems like by RAW they...
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread D&D General 1s and 20s: D&D's Narrative Mechanics.With TTRPGs: "Narrativist" refers to "telling a story" "Simulationist" refers to "simulating how physics works" "Gamist" refers to...
-
Theory of Games reacted to soviet's post in the thread D&D General 1s and 20s: D&D's Narrative Mechanics with Like.
I was the second post in the thread. I asked what you meant by 'narrative mechanics'. I got some laugh reacts but I was genuinely...
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread Worlds of Design: Battle Maneuvers.The AD&D version was outstanding, but its descendants have been lackluster at best - mostly due to the fact that D&D can't simulate how...
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread D&D General Psionic species and subspecies, will they make a comeback too?.There won't be many psychic races because the class delivers a lot of capability by itself.
-
Theory of Games reacted to Kobold Avenger's post in the thread D&D General Psionic species and subspecies, will they make a comeback too? with Like.
Anyways here's some of the existing Psionic species from before that I can remember: Githyanki: featured in Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes...
-
Theory of Games replied to the thread D&D General Lego Sandbox vs Open Sandbox (and other sandbox discussion).This approach only works with a strong Session 0 to make sure everyone is on the same page. Otherwise it can turn into #rpghorrorstory...