Theory of Games's latest activity

You're trying to appease both of these groups at the same time? You'd have better luck trying to get Matt Colville to slow down a bit...

It comes down to what you mean by "not as complicated & crunchy", really. Like, what kind of core dice 'mechanic' do you like (d20, 3d6...

I was a fan of MSH as well - up until I ran into M&M 2e. I'd have to say Power-Stunting in MSH was my least favorite thing because of...

And then if you don't change enough, people complain its not really a new game.

I get it - everything 'aint for everybody. But those of us who like GURPS are going to enjoy the system, largely because it's been...

Gaming Ballistic/Douglas Cole GURPS product line is just fantastic. I can’t speak highly enough about it. The Delvers to Grow lets...

You can find some of the author's other products here: Gaming Ballistic | Fantasy & Dungeon Roleplaying Games Gaming Ballistic |...

I don't necessarily disagree with that. There's a learning curve to figuring out which pieces you need. However, that's why this...

To me that's the beauty of GURPS and other "generic" systems: you can make exactly what you want, rather than being limited by whatever...

... and fun for those of us who enjoy that level of complexity. I'd rather have a system that does everything than one that won't let me...

Bumping this because it came up in a discussion elsewhere

Point-buy systems like M&M, Champions and GURPS Supers are definitely not for everyone. Just as more rules-lite games like MASKS, Tiny...

D&D is indeed not Tolkien nor Middle Earth but your assumption that they would expend significantly more resources and want to grow...

What's important is reading an rpg is a huge difference from actually playing the the rpg, especially playing a campaign (a series of...

After reading so many good things about it, I finally gave Shadowdark a try a few months ago. Our regular (mostly every other week) 5e...