I will say this for about the fifth time. There would be procedures to prevent the skeletons from rebelling in the worst-case scenario. I've covered everything you have said in previous posts. But in summary, the undead wouldn't be big ol skeletons. They would be optimized for work, not battle...
It is in the case where the only problem is that it is noticed. If someone sings a contract exclaiming their body can be "necromanced" and used for labor after death the moral question is taken out of the mix. The only problem left is that relatives might see their dead bodies and be grieved by...
In the case you were not joking:
If they are intelligent undead would they not know that these weren't sentient beings and just moving corpses? Even if they didn't know, the undead aren't exactly much of a unified force.
1: If there are politically motivated skeletons they must have a master who is controlling them. Now of course you could say this is horrible because terrorists can make a bunch of "animated" to fight for them. But so can law enforcement. This transformation occurs on the matrix, not just the...
Yes, the appeal of firearms in games is for violent purposes because people find artificial worlds with no consequence fun. I don't believe many players of DnD play so that they can establish a flourishing economy.
Of course, it's dangerous, just about everything we own is dangerous to a degree. You could log onto google and have your credit card number stolen, you could be driving your car to work and crash. Just because something has an inherent danger doesn't mean it shouldn't be made/done.
As it turns out you can have the bones in any form you want, however, if you want them to communicate properly they will need to be from the same corps.