tombowings's latest activity

I use my own world of Everbee. Right now we are in the Isian area which is mostly underground--so, my version of the Underdark. I have...

Homebrew. I get more excited if im running my own stuff. plus i preffer to run a low magic grimdark sandbox meat grinder, and not many...

I don't think rangers should have spells at all as a default, just class features focusing on exploration first, then combat (with a...

I liked SWSE's talent trees and feats approach. I had been hoping D&D 4e would go the same route. That's probably what I would do if I...

Watched Mononoke Hime again today (in IMAX!) and revived an old idea I've read somewhere of using the premise of the movie and apply it...

I want to focus on the adventure, not rolling to see if my class features work or if I'm going to tpk my own party. I certainly don't...

Mighty Deeds. Not something they get access to instantly, something they grow into. A Mighty Deed at (say) 5th level might be holding up...

While I still think you underestimate the potential of subclasses as genre tools, I see your point here. You have made me change me...

Sure, if your goal is to be as casual and generic a game as possible. Which WotC does, of course. But generally I think designers should...

I think you are underestimating the potential of the sub-class system. The fact that the champion, battlemaster fighter, and Eldritch...

That would be nice. I have had to disallow so many subclasses (College of Glamour, Archefay Patron, for example) because I simply cannot...

I would also want rules that explain where the super powers come from.

I totally disagree. Homebrewers have hacked 5e to fix a huge number of settings. All it require it for the core game to come with...

I would like to see a version of D&D that has enough flexibility that I can create the game world, then apply the system--not butcher...

For me, as much as I genuinely enjoy 5E, this would be my wants: One book. The core should be rules-light enough to cover all the...