TwoSix's latest activity

Yeap, the procedural is probably more in line with what @Lanefan does. Long running campaigns where the main cast changes as needed...

Yea, I agree with this. It’s trivial to narrate level 1 and 2 abilities as part of a character’s training backstory, just like the...

Player driven sandbox. BW enforces said playstyle by having the primary focus of play being PC Goal Completion, as opposed to the more...

Design that isn't opinionated has no value

I think I’d also want to know what a corruption feat “means”, in the narrative. Is it a ritual the character does to gain that power...

I was wanting to make a post in this thread, and your post helped me focus my thoughts. To my mind, a lot of games that others...

Yea, if you can get X number of feats for free without consequence, that’s what everyone will take. Corruption should fall into a...

I immediatelly had flashback to 3.5 taint. You do not want anyone to see your taint, as you never know how people may react to being...

I think it's legitimate to want to play a version of Galahad or Percival or Aragorn, as much as a slightly modernised Lancelot.

Yea, that’s a fair critique. I’m definitely influenced by my play groups’ lack of desire to play classical heroic archetypes.

Druid on druid action, involving two druids who love nature and one another very much, is a beautiful thing. Not tawdry at all!

If the question is “Did Twosix mean to imply something disturbing and tawdry?”, the answer is pretty much always “Yes”. :)

Maybe that player was suffering from main character syndrome?

Sounds like a bad case of main character syndrome!

Then he probably shouldn't have picked chaotic neutral as his alignment! ;)