UngainlyTitan's latest activity
-
I've had it happen, when I wanted to make a list using asterixes, and it converted it all to italics. I am happy to learn about escape... -
UngainlyTitan reacted to Lakesidefantasy's post in the thread D&D General Mapping: How Do You Do It? with
Like.
This looks to be boiling down to We-Like-Puzzles Players versus We-Hate-Puzzles Players. And I think we lean toward, er...topple over to... -
UngainlyTitan reacted to Thomas Shey's post in the thread D&D General Mapping: How Do You Do It? with Like.
The problem, again, is the ambiguity of "mapping" here. I think the GM having a map is part of that, but I don't see why the players...
-
UngainlyTitan replied to the thread D&D General Mapping: How Do You Do It?.This is where I disagree, not that it can cause confusion but it properly emulates anything, certainly not enough to be worth the bother.
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Edgar Ironpelt's post in the thread Player skill vs character skill? with Like.
I prefer a system where character skill is more important than player skill, and where the player-skill element is more a matter of...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Maxperson's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
When they make significant changes, they still won't need to create an entirely new setting around those changes, because settings are...
-
UngainlyTitan replied to the thread D&D General Mapping: How Do You Do It?.What is the purpose of the player drawing map if it does not correspond to any character activity? I really do not see what is gained by...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
Considering that 5.5e isn't too different from 5e, WoTC went half of the way instead of all of the way like they did when they made 4e.
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
If you were the IP holder of a game and you decided to make a new setting using the newly updated mechanics and options of that game...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to MonsterEnvy's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
Spelljammer was not disliked because of changes. It was disliked cause it was too short and didn’t give as much detail as it should have...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Maxperson's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
It doesn't look, walk or quack like the Forgotten Realms, though. There's literally nothing built into 5e default that is FR specific...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Maxperson's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
Because there isn't a difference. 1e, 2e, 4e and 5e do Eberron just as well as 3e and Eberron was built "for" 3e. Being built for 3e...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Paul Farquhar's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
I don’t. Settings are separate to rules. If I want to play a D&D game in Hyboria or Lankhmar, like 1st edition did, I can do that in 5e...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Mustrum_Ridcully's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting with Like.
No, they just wanted to create a new setting that used all the 3rd Edition conceits and ideas, and that didn't stop it from adding stuff...
-
UngainlyTitan reacted to Zardnaar's post in the thread D&D General Improving Ritual Caster and Pact of The Tome? with Like.
Pact of tome is fine. The problem is its second "upgraded" version is lacking vs chain and blade. Probably let the upgrade version add...