Yeah, wasn't calling you a liar? Wasn't really doubting you or Troll Lord, just that the D&D Team is known (as @Parmandur pointed out) to backtrack on this stuff.
Looking forward to your kickstarter, good luck.
Ah, I couldn't disagree more... a setting book should not be a history book. It is a vehicle for you to run games, a location for you to run stories.
Does it really matter if the population of Sharn is 100,000 or 1 million? I'd say no... it's supposed to be a big city, and supposed to hit...
I will refer to comment #367 which does a better job of explaining why Wildemount IMO is not nearly as engaging a product as something more vague.
This below to me is of far more usable quality, when ironically it uses a very similar format (though not content) as Wildemount.
https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/242796/did-william-marston-mandate-that-wonder-woman-be-continuously-published-for-dc-t
I guess some companies were crazy enough to sign such contracts though... even if in this case, they did eventually buy WW outright.
I'll tell you why... if I change those details, there is always the risk a Wildemount fan will tell me I'm "running the game" wrong. If I want to create my own NPC for the mayor of this small town, I have to use this specific halfling or else I'm playing "contrary to the author's intent."
Bah...
I understand that people LOVE gazetteers, and it is very similar to a format used in previous editions that folks are fond for... but my (controversial) opinion is that I think it a complete waste of space.
I can't stand how Wildemount goes out of it's way to detail every settlement...