Recent content by Warnavick

  1. W

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    I don't think anyone played it that way either ,but it is technically true to the rules. And it was actually addressed in the new rules. As see invisibility now says " you see creatures/objects with the invisible condition as if they are visible ". The the invisible condition specifically...
  2. W

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    Specifically the interaction was that the invisible condition did 2 things seperated by bullet points. 1. Be invisible. 2. You have advantage to attack others and others have disadvantage to attack you. See invisibility specifically only negates the first point rather than the whole...
  3. W

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    For further information on this change. The reason being is because they now use magical contagions instead of diseases. Monsters that previously inflicted a disease now just inflict the poison condition. Mundane diseases are not really mentioned in the rules. So spells or features that cure...
  4. W

    D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

    To try and clarify, I don't think you need to ask permission as the DM for a social skill against the PC in this context. It would just be a reverse of roles for the player and DM. The DM describes the NPCs social action and then the player decides if their character is influenced, not...
  5. W

    D&D General A glimpse at WoTC's current view of Rule 0

    A bag of holding in 5e has a limit of 500lbs and a 64 cubic feet space limit. So unless your party is very light/small with minimal gear, you probably are only going to fit 2 people at most in an empty bag of holding. For example, My average sized valor bard human weighs about 240lbs between him...
Top