W'rkncacnter's latest activity

Apologies for necro'ing this thread, but I'm about to take my players through the back half of The Last Starry Sky and looking for maps...

I firmly believe that nothing should be a class unless you can think of 10 archetypes for it. That's why I love the current 13ish...

What could go wrong? At this point you should just give in and give the fella smites.

oh dear god, precision attack plus stunning assault...yeah no i'd never allow that.

Nah, just use both at the same time! We could then have a feat called the Inefficient Tactician with pre-requisites that you have access...

We at ENP have put out a whole bunch of books too! The ‘core’ system has not changed (other than errata) but various books deal with...

You'd think that this would be a bizarre response, but I've seen several people take that stance. As though anyone playing a...

Honestly, this has always struck me as being a little weird. If I ask a melee character's player if they'd like to make another attack...

Warlord. Instant no brainer. It would be an inarguable olive branch to a community that has, more than once, felt pretty damn snubbed by...

Don't forget how flavorful Warlord powers were as well. One of my personal favorites came from the ranged Warlord,"Race the Arrow"...

Oh, that I would disagree with. The Warlord just has so many potential subclasses. I mean, good grief, 4e had what, six different...

are these really worth being a WHOLE CLASS, though, or just a subclass or two? genuine question, i'm not sure.

i saw my chance to make a DM of the Rings reference and i am taking it

And, frankly, even the "martials" we have can often cast spells or have spell like abilities. I mean, Barbarians can literally fly...