W'rkncacnter's latest activity
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Bill Zebub's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with
Like.
There have been countless RPGs created, with an astonishing array of creativity. Surely if it were easy...or even really hard...to... -
W'rkncacnter replied to the thread Gate Pass Gazette Issue #48 is meeting with an informant!.wait i might buy this one on release those first two articles sound sick
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Micah Sweet's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
Fair enough. I prefer definition and granularity, but definition is a must.
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Thomas Shey's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
I don't even insist on granularity; I'm okay with the skill system in Savage Worlds which defaults to awfully chunky. But its still...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Thomas Shey's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
I have mixed feelings about backgrounds as a skill stand-in, I have to say; even if they're pre-defined by the system they're used in...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
Level Up offers up quite a number of new and innovative ways to play 5e.
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
One of the problems with Weapon Mastery in 2024 D&D is that only gives you one little perk. Ryoko's Guide to the Yokai Realms for 5e has...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Micah Sweet's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
It's a great game, but keep in mind I have no problem with complexity if it adds depth and more-or-less maintains setting logic. Not a...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Micah Sweet's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
That is one way of solving it. I prefer a balance of in-character roleplay and robust, setting-modeling mechanics myself.
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Staffan's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with
Sad.
(I was considering 1974, but decided that AD&D with the ranger and paladin being "fighter plus" and referring to the fighter as "mere"... -
W'rkncacnter reacted to Staffan's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
Marvel Super Heroes, in various versions. They pretty much all have both rules for rolling your own supers and for translating ones from...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to kigmatzomat's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
That is, IMO, the delineator between Tactical Studies Rules' fantasy wargame where players used heroes (and their hirelings/followers)...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Corinnguard's post in the thread D&D General When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat? with Like.
Level Up has it where the Ranger class is a martial class right from the start. It has only one half-caster archetype, the Wildborn...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to Thomas Shey's post in the thread Pathfinder 2E Do you think 1st or 2nd edition is more complicated? with Like.
I said 1e, but I want to unpack it a little for fairness: 1. I am not directly very familiar with PF1e, but I was familiar with D&D 3...
-
W'rkncacnter reacted to payn's post in the thread Pathfinder 2E Do you think 1st or 2nd edition is more complicated? with Like.
This highlights so much of the differences. Both look complicated, but PF2 executes so much more easily.