Zardnaar's latest activity

I've remembered this post snd yeah I think youre right. Druids/clerics AoE, Sorcerers and Wizards for single/few targets. Fighter...

Lots of great control options. I'm leaning towards cleric×druid combo.

Its kinda fun. . 5E leans towards super hero play later on. Fun declines. 1st is good for newbie games and new editions.

I've been consistent with that. We wont have a clearer picture until year 3 imho. Biggest threat to 5 5 is 5.0/inertia folloqed by WotC.

I've been advocating for 2E types saves since 3E. Paladins, Monks, Fighters I would play lvl 1-20. 4 vs 8 5.0 cf 5.5.

One reason I rate emanations highly. Less damage up front but every round+whatever else impure doing. Doesn't hit allies eg spirit...

People push old 3.Xisms which are no longer tried. Spellcasters suck at damage and lack save or dies. AoE maybe but seventeen...

Even in a simulation type game guns wont outperform a D&D longbow until you hit 19th century tech. IRL guns penetrated armor, simple...

The AD&Dand OD&D re-releases were before 5E landed. Your statements more applicable to 4E. We know rather statements of the...

Counter argument is 5E relative simplicity biggest D&D ever. People who provide feedback online tend towards complexity more...

5.0 has a lot of small issues that added up over 10 years. Mo steps completely ducked along with encounter rules. Class design was...

Modern game design is leading towards simplicity. 4E doubled down on complexity its a big reason why it tanked. Its complexity slowed...

Think ill go with action tgat triggers it. So yes unless its a bonus action or reaction. Simplicity is yes to everything. I dont...

At the levels peopke actually play the martials are better imho. Exception maybe fir clerics and druids. High level wizards still...

20q4 monsters kinda suck. 8/12 classes a bit mid 1-20. 5.5 4 are meh 1-20.