Do Tariffs Apply To RPG Books? Maybe, Maybe Not!

us-customs-apis-pt1.jpg


When the recent tariffs were announced by the US, panic was the first reaction from tabletop roleplaying game publishers.

This was soon followed by a wave of hope as people shared an official exemption list which included "printed books, brochures, leaflets and similar printed matter in single sheets, whether or not folded" and "printed books, brochures, leaflets and similar printed matter, other than in single sheets" (see codes 49011000 and 49019900). Seemingly, TTRPG rulebooks might escape the tariffs!

Screenshot 2025-04-14 at 2.10.01 PM.png

However, ICv2 is reporting that this may not be the case. According to a pair of rulings dating all the way back to 1989 and 1991, TTRPG rulebooks are instead classified as "arcade, table or parlor games… parts and accessories thereof". These rulings came from the US Custom and Border Protection agency, and were applied to Columbia Games and West End Games, respectively.

The first ruling was titled "Fantasy Role Play Expansion Modules".

In our opinion, heading 9504 provides the more specific description of the merchandise in issue. The modules enhance fantasy game play; they were not designed for passive reading.

- US Customs and Border Protection, November 1989​

The second ruling, titled "Fantasy role play games books are expansion modules are designed to enhance fantasy game play, not for passive reading" reads as follows.

As a result of the foregoing, the instant merchandise is classified under subheading 9504.90.9080, HTSUSA, as articles for arcade, table or parlor games, including pinball machines, bagatelle, billiards and special tables for casino games; automatic bowling alley equipment; parts and accessories thereof; other, other, other, other. The applicable rate of duty is 4.64 percent ad valorem.

- US Customs and Border Protection, November 1991​

These rulings are both 35 years old, so there is no guarantee that the same ruling would be made today. This ruling, from last year, classifies a Shadowrun supplement as a book, noting that "This ruling only takes into consideration the books when imported separately." But it does cast doubt on the status of TTRPG rulebooks. Are they books or are they games, according to the US customs agencies? If the latter, TTRPG books coming from China would suffer the same 145% tariff that boxed sets, accessories, and boardgames do. That means that a $30K print run of a few thousand books would incur an additional $43,500 bill when arriving at port in the US--considerably more than it costs to manufacture them in the first place.

Products coming from countries other than China are currently subject to a lower 10% tariff. However, with the speed at which the situation changes, it is impossible for companies to plan shipments to the US. Whatever the tariffs, what is necessary for trade is stability. Most organisations need a lead time measured in weeks--or sometimes months--in order to budget and plan for manufacturing and international shipments, and the tariffs are currently changing on a daily basis. And without even knowing for sure whether TTRPG rulebooks incur the tariff, we may have to wait until the first shipment hits port to find out!

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Agree to disagree. I don't see how moving production from China to a country that is openly trying to break mine will help Canadian TTRPG fans or producers in the short or long term. It just sounds like moving games production to a hostile nation that will tariff us on a whim.

Respectfully, I'm not sure that Americans can fully appreciate the levels of distrust and antipathy that this situation has engendered in other countries, especially their former allies. Insofar as possible, I am refusing to buy any product from any American source for the foreseeable future, and the latter sentiment is very widespread up here. At this point, it's not even about saving money; if necessary, I now pay more to buy from non-American sources.

Okay, America is 60% of the TTRPG market. Can those companies afford to write off the other 40%? When they put out a "proudly made in the USA" press release, that's the effect.
Sorry, what I meant was that the US would benefit from being back manufacturing to the US. And that Canada would benefit from bringing back manufacturing to Canada. Et cetera.

And, should we weather this insanity and return to a time where Canada can trust their southern neighbor . . . bringing back manufacturing to the continent will benefit the continent.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Sorry, what I meant was that the US would benefit from being back manufacturing to the US. And that Canada would benefit from bringing back manufacturing to Canada. Et cetera.
This is what I don't agree with. I think that will make everyone poorer, aside from the folks at the very top. I definitely think it would make our hobby substantially more expensive, for everyone.

There's no way that an American company can make miniatures, for example, in the USA without significantly higher costs. I mean, labour alone, even assuming they invest in the necessary equipment and expertise. Same for a Canadian company. The printing business won't be as impacted, but economic nationalism is still going to raise prices.
 

Sorry, what I meant was that the US would benefit from being back manufacturing to the US. And that Canada would benefit from bringing back manufacturing to Canada. Et cetera
No, not really. Neither benefits. What a nation needs for manufacturing to be viable is lots of poor people. That’s what China’s got.
 

Respectfully, I'm not sure that Americans can fully appreciate the levels of distrust and antipathy that this situation has engendered in other countries, especially their former allies. Insofar as possible, I am refusing to buy any product from any American source for the foreseeable future, and the latter sentiment is very widespread up here. At this point, it's not even about saving money; if necessary, I now pay more to buy from non-American sources.
I don't blame you in the least. What's happening is terrible. If you are Canadian (I think you are?) please accept my apology on behalf of the Americans who want nothing to do with this insanity.
 

There are definitely downsides to having your products produced in China. Piracy is one of them.

And, the US would certainly benefit if we could rebuild our manufacturing base domestically, to give companies a realistic option in producing products here.

For those companies who have already figured it out . . . yes, good for them! And for their customers!

But these tariffs aren't going to solve the problem for the rest of the US. They are just going to dramatically increase costs for US consumers, destroy companies and entire industries, and fail to meaningfully restore manufacturing to the US . . . and the rest gets too political, but GRRRRRRR . . .

The thing so many people lose sight of is the US is already the second-largest manufacturer in the world. In other words, the manufacturing base is already "here", it's just that most people clamoring for "the return" don't understand just how much of manufacturing is now done by automation. Hand work is an ever-increasing rarity in manufacturing for the modern era and will only become less. The days of well-paid union production jobs are, for the most part, long gone and aren't coming back.

The other thing is the timeline needed to move manufacturing facilities. It's not as if the leadership of company x just walks in one day s and says "We're going to build a new facility there" and shovels drop the next week. The logistical planning and permitting takes longer than the actual contruction.
 

Respectfully, I'm not sure that Americans can fully appreciate the levels of distrust and antipathy that this situation has engendered in other countries, especially their former allies. Insofar as possible, I am refusing to buy any product from any American source for the foreseeable future, and the latter sentiment is very widespread up here. At this point, it's not even about saving money; if necessary, I now pay more to buy from non-American sources.
We are an unreliable partner at best and an actively hostile entity at worse. The current administration made actually made a deal with Canada during its first term, but decided to go against it during his second term by starting a trade war. What this means is even if Canada and the United States kiss and make up, Canada can't really rely on the United States not to change its mind next week, next month, or two years down the road. We are going to continue to see fallout from this for many, many years to come. Supply chains will shift, businesses will fail, new businesses will appear, and it'll take a while before a new normal settles in. It's going to be interesting to see how this shapes up for the table top industry.

Okay, America is 60% of the TTRPG market. Can those companies afford to write off the other 40%? When they put out a "proudly made in the USA" press release, that's the effect.
I can't imagine most American TTRPG companies count the rest of the world as a significant source of their business. Some, certainly, but I think most games produced here in the United States are designed for the domestic market.
 

Sorry, what I meant was that the US would benefit from being back manufacturing to the US. And that Canada would benefit from bringing back manufacturing to Canada. Et cetera.

And, should we weather this insanity and return to a time where Canada can trust their southern neighbor . . . bringing back manufacturing to the continent will benefit the continent.
I don't know about Canada, but it'll likely be at least a generation before Europe trusts the US again. Trust comes by foot, but leaves by racecar.
 

The thing so many people lose sight of is the US is already the second-largest manufacturer in the world. In other words, the manufacturing base is already "here", it's just that most people clamoring for "the return" don't understand just how much of manufacturing is now done by automation.
that, and that the US has a surplus on the service side of business, which generally creates higher paying jobs than manufacturing (on average), so you are better off creating higher paying jobs than trying to bring the lowest paying ones back
 


This is a fairly controversial economic claim!
This is the Yin-Yang of economic theory: what's better, higher wages or lower prices? Lower prices create greater demand, which increases employment. Higher wages gives greater buying power, which also increases demand...and increases employment. Unless higher wages cause lower employment due to labor costs. It's a Gordian Knot!
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top