Search results

There's no maybe about it. I am saying she isn't interested in it, but gets us into combat often anyway. Naw. I am saying the player shines in social encounters. Her PC is fine at it but I am not talking about rolls. I didn't call combat pesky. I didn't say or imply what you appear to be...

I think if they just answered the question @Charlaquin highlighted most of the problem with the rule is resolved. That being: Once you successfully take the Hide [Action], can you leave the conditions which allowed you to hide (see below) into conditions which normally do not allow you to make...

Unfortunately the example they used gives that answer regardless of this particular question because it's drawing from two different spell sources and doesn't avail itself of a mechanic where you can actually gain spell choices which are above your caster level (only Wizard can do this). A...

I make my PCs more powerful than everyone else because everyone else in my group makes their PCs so weak (mechanically and with in-game choices), and our DM uses published adventures, that we'd get absolutely trounced all the time or force the DM to tweak every encounter downward in power if I...

I don't think that's at all a fair implication. An optimizer usually decides on the kind of mechanics they want to play, pieces those together through different combinations, and then looks at the mechanics and decides what story they want to tell which fits those mechanics. The story...

It doesn't say either. It says you prepare spells as a single-class character, but calculate spell slots as a multiclass character, creating the conflict. You're just repeating the conflict. We all understand it says you prepare spells as single-class character, right?

Jessica Jones, Season 1, the Villain (Kilgrave) has this power. He's incredibly evil, and very powerful.

It doesn't say that, however. Well, you have the issue of obtaining 9th level spells in your spellbook. But yes, what does happen? It's a fair question. I know how I'd run it in my game (you can't) but I am not so positive the rules were written that way.

Completed Tomb of Annihilation last night. January 14th, 2021 to April 16th, 2025. Epic!

Halfing is in a fog cloud and had used the Hide action while there due to the Heavy Obscurement qualifying them for the Hide action. Foes 1, 2 and 3 have no ability to see in a fog cloud, but just triggered See Invisibility on themselves which allows them to see a creature that had the Invisible...

All see invisibility does is "you see creatures and objects that have the Invisible condition as if they were visible". It does not say it negates the invisible condition. You still retain the invisible condition, you just can be seen "as if they were visible" by the creature that has See...

You're not a professional Economist are you? You listed your credentials as "writer, game designer, marketer, podcaster" I have lifelong business experience, run a business, and am an attorney. But I am not an expert on the level of professional Economist. In terms of being an Economist, I'm an...

Yes but I'm OK with uncertainty on that front as long as Crawford (and before him Mearls) would reply we'd usually go with that.

It was nice when WOTC had someone who would answer these kinds of questions direction on Twitter or elsewhere.

I don't know. I'd really like to know though. My 9th level arcane trickster, 3 level wizard would sure like to know if he can hide as a bonus action, step out into the open with a minimum 22 hide check thanks to Reliable Talent and expertise, and then upcast Tasha's Hideous Laughter on three...

So you can hide behind 3/4ths cover. But if someone casts see invisible (even if you're just a rogue using the ordinary hide action), they can see you behind 3/4ths cover? "as if they were visible" to me means if you still meet the conditions for hiding, which includes 3/4ths cover, they're...

So it now reads: Hide [Action] With the Hide action, you try to conceal yourself. To do so, you must succeed on a DC 15 Dexterity (Stealth) check while you’re Heavily Obscured or behind Three-Quarters Cover or Total Cover, and you must be out of any enemy’s line of sight; if you can see a...

Woah, they fixed it! Conjure Fey (p. 255) In the “Using a Higher-Level Spell Slot” subsection, “2d12” is now “1d12.” Conjure Minor Elementals (p. 254) In the “Using a Higher-Level Spell Slot” subsection, “2d8” is now “1d8.”

As someone who has posted about how tariffs have directly massively damaged me, yes I am aware. Please don't mistake my correcting a claim someone thinks they know "with 100% certainty" the future as some defense of anything. I disagree. See, that's you telling me with certainty you know the...