Search results

Just another stellar example of Wizbro's failed marketing. Seeing as 3.5 is the last edition of D&D, we can keep playing for eternity.

3.5 is the last edition of D&D.

Has anyone else house ruled the Soulknife as having a full BAB? I know I plan on doing so the next 3.5 game I run.

I have an idea for a modified Soulknife character. Instead of a Mindblade, he uses a Mindstaff. Two-handed weapon that has a single attack at 1st level. The standard Soulknife can use the Mindblade and a shield. My modification means no shield but he would get the 1.5 x damage increase for using...

I don't play any computer or console games. The only console I actually own is an original Nintendo. And that hasn't been out of the box in over a decade. WoW just doesn't appeal to me. Too much like a second job with a chat client attached.

Rod of Lordly Might Frostbrand Cubic Gate

I did vote with my dollar. I own all the 3.5 GR books I want. I will continue to buy M&M books however.

While I am glad that Green Ronin is doing this, I am also saddened by the knowledge there will be no new 3.5 material in the future.

I thought it was a good retro PA game. But my preference for that genre is 4th edition Gamma World.

I tried that. They called me and told me that they wouldn't print what I wanted because it was copyrighted material. It was a legally free PDF given to the world by the author. Kinkos wants a bloody Papal Bull before they will print anything. Go find a small local shop.

How 2E saw them...

I voted yes. But I also house ruled that anyone can add XP to the creation process, not just the spell caster. I see the XP as the 'lifeforce' of a character. And pouring your lifeforce into a magic item makes perfect sense to me.

I love Star Frontiers. I thought it was a great game when it came out and I would love to see either an OGL or D20 Modern version. If you can find s copy it is very much worth a look. Which version of Gamma World are you interested in? There have been seven of them. My personal favorite edition...

Why would I import what is arguably one of the *worst* rules in 4E into another system? 3.5 got it right, it didn't need 'fixing'.

Art can make or break a gaming book for me. I have passed on buying a book just because the art was bad. I've bought gaming books just because the art was good. For me item illustrations are particularly important. Especially weapons and armour. If the game designers can't choose good...

I think that should be telling you something.

It depends on the book. Some I do read cover-to-cover, others I just skim through looking for the crunch. The more original the work, the more likely I am to really dig in and read everything.

I've been playing with a Skinwalker type of class myself. Mostly because I like the idea of a werebear but hate how you have to build one in 3.5. I think the class should be based on the Druid alternative class ability Shapeshift from the PHB II. My idea was to also build it off of the barbarian...

Tweaking 3.5 was all that was needed. 4E took the game into an entirely new and completely unneeded direction.